I get my inspiration from a variety of sources but mostly my ideas come to me when I'm walking and I notice a particular detail that I think could be the basis for a scene. Sometimes this might be an obvious subject like when I scramble along the coast and find the perfect tide pool but it could also be a subtle feature like the curve of the terrain that matches with the direction of the sun.
Compositionally, I tend to prefer wide expansive views. I want to see it all. Sometimes it seems like my wide angle lens is glued to my camera. I'm also very particular about the lighting in my images as I use light and dark areas to guide the viewer throughout my scene. Finally, I'm enamored with natural frames and I use this technique often. Whether it be the moon appearing through a gap in a stand of trees or a sunset viewed through the mouth of a cave. I feel like the frame is a window to a magical scene.
Once I have the germ of an idea, I start by brainstorming and then deciding what colors, tones, and lighting I would like in the scene. Then I ask myself what environmental conditions I need to achieve that. This could cover a variety of factors such as the weather, time of day, time of year, phase of the moon, and so forth.
I'll then return to the spot when the conditions are optimal. If I'm lucky everything will line up on the first attempt. But frequently they might not materialize, especially if I'm looking for a specific cloud formation. In this case, I may not even pull out my camera and I return home without taking a picture. I'll keep coming back until the conditions align. Sometimes i can return quickly, perhaps the next day, but other times it might be months or years (e.g. images involving an alignment with the sun or moon). Half a dozen attempts wouldn't be unusual and I have one scene where I'm probably close to twenty attempts. If everything does align, I'll pull out my camera and photograph. I normally focus on just a single composition per outing.
Capturing images is just the beginning. I work digitally and process them in several steps to match my original vision. First, if I've taken multiple images I may blend or combine them for technical and creative reasons. From the technical side, I may average multiple identical images together to reduce noise (graininess) or stitch images to obtain a wider field of view that wouldn't be possible in a single photograph. Creatively, I may take multiple pictures to capture changing conditions in the scene. This could be the movement of light as the sun goes in and out of clouds, or the motion of waves against the shore. This is usually over a period of 10-15 minutes but could be as long as a few hours. Next, I remove dust spots and clone out minor distractions such as an errant branch or any garbage I was not able to pick up. I also fix any distortion from the lens that results in crooked or wavy horizons. Last, I apply creative adjustments which may include modifying global and local contrast, adjusting and changing colors, and transforming the image into black and white. I make decisions here according to my aesthetics and original concept.
Finally, I'd would like to be transparent about my editing and whether my scenes are real. I've thought about this issue for a long time so I have some strong feelings about this. I believe the power of photography comes from a connection to a real place or event. And since photography is the medium for my art, I maintain that connection in my art. So in my images, the objects you see were really there, in that exact same position and size. I will not add in a gigantic moon that was never in that location. I won't paste in a sky from a different location. I won't add a figure to landscape that wasn't there and I don't stage people in my images.